James Patrick Kelly. Undone.
Originally in Asimovs, June 2001
My original review:
Kelly volunteers that for this story he is standing on the shoulders of the giants Cordwainer Smith and Alfred Bester.
The story starts far, far future, with a seriously post-modern genmod human called Mada, fleeing across multi-dimensional multi-chronological space. The ship's AI (actually a DI - Dependent Intelligence) is a bit of a wuss, panicking because the chasing Utopians have put an identity mine five minutes downwhen of them. Desperate situations call for desperate measures, and Mada's evasive action is quite dramatic : jumping to the even further far future (two 10th of a galactic spin).
Mada makes her way to humanity's homeworld, and finds it a strange, sparsely populated place. The contrast in this second half of the story to the first is sharp. The story slips close (albeit with the rider about Kelly doffing his virtual plume-ed cap to Cordwainer Smith/Alfred Bester) to a faux-Medieval cod-pastoral idyll.
She decides to re-populate the planet (and *that* genmod transformation is a real treat) and re-start humanity on its way to the stars. In the climax Mada makes a major personal choice.
An enjoyable story, well-written and inventive. In previous reviews I have bemoaned the Eleanor Arnason 'Lydia Duluth' stories for lack of invention - I would use this story to exemplify what I think good SF is about : more ideas in a couple of pages than a tranche of Lydia Duluth stories.
Discussion
A strange collection. Several stories from Redshift, none of which, to my mind are worthy of inclusion. The SCI FICTION selectees are mostly of a high standard. The Asimovs/Analog/F&SF stories could almost have been chosen at random as they don't, to my mind, stand out from the vast majority of stories from those magazines during 2001. The inclusion of the Aldiss story in both Year's Best SF #5 and #7 is worrying - how does something like that happen? There is to my mind, a sneaking suspicion that Hartwell has several names in mind each year, and they get a story in on the strength of their name rather than the story itself.
So, having read Silverberg's and Dozois' Years Best, what of the selection of the three anthologies?
Dozois has, of course, the advantage of size (!) in that he can include more longer stories, and more stories per se. (Last year Hartwell tried with his #6 to boost up his number with a number of micro stories form Nature), and his collection had to my taste, the biggest proportion of stories whose inclusion I agreed with. Silverberg's collection was more to my taste than that of Hartwell's, although I do object to Silverberg's collection being put together absurdly quickly, and presumably excluding some stories published late in the year from inclusion.
copyright Mark Watson 3rd August 2002